Fast food workers across the nation went on strike Thursday. Their demand is a $15 minimum wage and unionization rights, and Oakland workers have joined the strike.

Strikers met at a McDonald’s on Jackson Street, where a common rallying cry was, “We can’t survive on $8.25!” Some workers walked off the job and joined the crowd. Photos posted on social media show strikers outside of McDonald’s and Jack In The Box, and include a striker dressed as a disgruntled Ronald McDonald. KPFA’s Up Front program interviewed a striking Oakland worker from KFC who told host Brian Edwards-Tiekert she made “poverty wages,” and was forced to turn to food stamps and Medicaid because of the low wages her job provided. Walking out on the job at KFC, she met with other strikers at a McDonald’s at Jackson and 14th.

Walkouts and work stoppages of this kind have been going on sporadically for the past year, initially starting in New York City. Many of the organizing workers are long-time fast food employees who find themselves unable to support themselves and/or their families on the low wages the industry pays. This combined with the demands of constant customer service performance, erratic work hours, and no union representation has pushed many workers to participate in the biggest fast-food strike in US history as well as a potential escalation in a historic labor challenge to the fast-food industry.

Strikers outside the McDonald’s (and later at a Jack In The Box on International Boulevard) also spoke about their struggle to choose between paying for food, rent, or health care. This scenario has forced some workers to rely on food stamps — which ends up being a government subsidy to the huge fast food companies who then themselves rely on federal assistance to make up the difference between the wage they pay and the needs of their employees. This same issue has also compelled Walmart workers across the nation to walk out and strike for better wages and working conditions.

The median fast food wage in the nation is $8.50 an hour, and though California will raise its minimum wage to $10 an hour by 2016, strikers say at least $15 an hour is both necessary and fair. This argument is not unique to workers and unions. Some economists agree fully with the $15 demand, and many others, including 100 economists who signed a petition to raise the federal minimum wage to $10.50, recognize that an increase is needed.

 

Photo Credit: Steve Rhodes

About The Author

3 Responses

  1. Marcus

    Give them their pay raises!!! it will now make the Big Mac Meal $12.65 As a result, their rents will increase by 50% as well and so will the PG&E bill etc as we will see inflation in everything so in real income…it’s a push.

    But as a landlord who owns rental properties in Oakland…I can’t wait! Because now the average working class can now pay more in rent if their salaries increased to $15.

    The rich will keep getting richer and the poor…we’ll they are too uneducated to even understand basic economics…and that’s why they are poor.

    Reply
  2. Phillip

    Marcus,

    If they go from $8.25 to $15.00 an hour, that will constitute an ~82% raise. If that causes essentials to go up in price by 50% (food, rent, electric etc), then they will be less poor as that extra $2.65 / hr can go to something else. That’s “basic economics”.

    If you’re a landlord and don’t understand basic economics, maybe it’s not “basic economics” that make poor people poor. I agree, a better education will help people move out of poverty, but you also have to give people the freedom to not worry about putting food on the table, affording 3 decent meals a day, affording a reasonable housing, living in a safe place, and affording a quality education. If everyone who is poor today suddenly learns “basic economics”, I doubt that will put even a moderate dent in reducing the number of people living below the poverty line.

    Reply
  3. big maC

    its survival of the fittest.
    philip you sound like a socialist commie.

    the world is a giant pyramid.

    there has to be poor people at the bottom for the people in the middle and top to live their modest and wealthy lifestyles.

    and it is simple economics. you just dont get it.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.