Brenda Fuller
By Suzanne Manneh, New America Media and Investigative Reporting
Workshop
Last March, Brenda Fuller lost her two-bedroom condo in East Oakland to foreclosure. Now she is a renter in a volatile housing market.
(Faces of Foreclosure - Brenda Fuller from New America Media on Vimeo.)
Over the past two years, Fuller, 59, moved three times, first to a house in East Oakland that she didn't know had been foreclosed on and was sold at auction three months after she moved in. The second, she left after three attempted break-ins, despite its location in relatively upscale Laurel Heights. Now she lives in an apartment complex near MacArthur Boulevard, where there have been three homicides in the surrounding area since March of this year.
For Fuller, the fight to save the only home she ever owned was a multifaceted, three-year struggle.
In the summer of 2007, her homeowners association initiated foreclosure actions on her condo to collect overdue assessments, which Fuller could not afford to pay. At the time, she was unemployed and on temporary disability. She sought pro bono legal help and eventually paid $1,400 to settle her $2,114.46 debt.
In late 2008, Fuller then began a year-and-half struggle with her lender, Bank of America, to modify her home loan.
But the battle with her homeowners group, she said, had drained so much of her time and energy, she wasn't sure if she could survive another fight.
"This has been very frustrating and has taken a toll on me both physically and mentally," she said.
In November 2008, she learned the interest rate on her loan would be adjusted Jan. 1, 2009, nearly doubling her monthly payment to nearly $5,000. She said she knew she couldn't afford it, so she found a rental and moved as soon as she could before her credit score decreased from missing mortgage payments. She immediately stopped making payments on her property, but for a year and half struggled tried to strike a deal with Bank of America to modify her home loan in the hopes of lowering her monthly payments and moving back.
In mid-February 2010, Fuller said she finally received a "hopeful" call from Bank Of America, asking for more financial documents to move her modification application forward. The following week, she said she received notice from the bank that she was in foreclosure.
"The right hand didn't know what the left hand was doing," she said. "The foreclosure department didn't know that it was in loan modification, and the loan modification department didn't know it was in foreclosure."
The bank eventually auctioned her condo – appraised at $375,000 - for $52,000, in March 2010.
The lasting impact, however, is that the foreclosure has left her under a mountain of debt. When she emerged from the two-year ordeal, Fuller owed the IRS $14,000 in taxes.
Fuller qualified for a payment plan and recently started paying $175 per month in an effort to get out of the hole, "but that's not doing any good," she said. "Each month, the total amount increases nearly $500 because of penalties and interest."
Although Fuller said the debt is burdensome, she added that she'd be in "real financial trouble" if she were responsible for paying the remainder of the loan.
"That would impact me tremendously," she said. "I just might have to work until I'm 100."
Fuller says that while she plans on "going forward with life," she has a different outlook on home ownership as a result of her ordeals.
"I'm not living in the past, but I don't think I will own a home again," she said. "I don't … trust the [housing] industry. It was not about the American dream. It was about the dollar bill. They sold me a home to put a dollar bill in their pocket."
"Unlike the 400,000 Oaklanders made homeless by the Dustbowl who were immortalized by John Steinbeck in the Grapes of Wrath"
hmm, i didn't know the Grapes of Wrath was set in Oakland. I always thought it told the story of the Okies, who were from Oklahoma, and came to California and worked in migrant labor camps after losing their family farms due to foreclosure. also, considering that the entire population of Oakland was approx. 275,000 in 1933 (according to this account), and 304,000 in 1941 (according to this account), it seems extremely unlikely that 400k Oakland residents could be made homeless, since that number is significantly higher than the city's entire population at that time. in actuality, Oakland's population steadily rose throughout the Depression years.