FCC Chairman comes to Oakland, announces new apps initiative

FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski

FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski

Oakland’s burgeoning tech community received official recognition Thursday, as Federal Communications Commission Chairman Julius Genachowski presided over two press conferences. Appearing in a forum entitled “Bridging the Digital Divide” sponsored by the Stride Center, Genachowski was flanked by Oakland Mayor Jean Quan, Rachelle Chong of the California Technology Agency, Jen Pahlka of Code for America, and Damian Thorman of the Knight Foundation.

Genachowski’s appearance marked the announcement of “Apps for Communities,” a new contest launched by the FCC and the Knight Foundation intended to lessen the digital divide by making government data more accessible to mobile phone users.

The contest, which has a prize of $100,000, is an attempt to engage the one-third of Americans without home broadband access, a demographic disproportionately represented by low-income Americans, people for whom English is not their native language, communities of color, older Americans, and people with disabilities.

During the brief discussion, Thorman explained that the “town square of old has moved to the Internet.” Making government data accessible to mobile phone users could result in “more voices” and “better democracy,” he added.

In his remarks, Genachowski said he was concerned that the costs of digital exclusion are rising. There are 100 million Americans without broadband access, he said, while in places like South Korea and Singapore, as much as 90% of the population is online.

“In the 21st century, there are few innovations more relevant to our lives” than broadband, the Chairman said.

However, “government can’t meet these challenges alone,” he added, noting that the Stride Center is an example of how the public and private sectors can work together to address how technology can best serve digitally-excluded communities.The Apps for Communities contest, he said, could stimulate efforts to “engage people who are less likely to be online.”

Following his announcement, Genachowski was quickly hustled out the door and across the street to the Marriott hotel, where he delivered the same remarks at another forum sponsored by ABAG, at which Quan, San Francisco Mayor Ed Lee, and San Jose Mayor Chuck Reed were in attendance. Genachowski was scheduled to wrap up his Bay Area appearances with a Commonwealth Club forum Thursday evening at the Computer History Museum in Mountain View.

Although face time with the nation’s premier communications and technology official was nice, the forum was, in the words of one observer, somewhat “underwhelming.” Due to the program running late, there was no opportunity for media members to ask Genachowski questions (as the agenda had noted there would be), which made the event more of a photo-opp and less an interactive press conference.

In a perfect world, there would have been a chance to question the Chairman about some of the nuts and bolts of the FCC’s proposed broadband plan, as well as some of the issues still swirling around Net Neutrality, such as the exclusion of wireless providers from regulations designed to ensure open Internet protections for consumers.

Similarly, there was no opportunity to gauge the FCC’s stance on upcoming tech issues such as mobile TV and its potential impact on low-power television stations which are threatened by this fast-moving new development. As far as bridging the digital divide goes, it remains uncertain how much of this is rhetoric and what will actually prove possible, without a leveling of the Beltway playing field. Currently, the lobbying efforts of telecommunications companies and Internet Service Providers hold an imbalanced amount of influence on FCC practices, to the detriment of media reform advocates and, ultimately, consumers.

Still, Genachowski’s appearance was a good look for Oakland, and bodes well for its future development as an innovative tech center. For more information about the Apps for Communities program, visit here.

 

Eric K. Arnold has been writing about urban music culture since the mid-1990s, when he was the Managing Editor of now-defunct 4080 Magazine. Since then, he’s been a columnist for such publications as The Source, XXL, Murder Dog, Africana.com, and the East Bay Express; his work has also appeared in the San Francisco Chronicle, Vibe, Wax Poetics, SF Weekly, XLR8R, the Village Voice and Jamrock, as well as the academic anthologies Total Chaos and The Vinyl Ain’t Final. Eric began his journalistic career while DJing on college radio station KZSC, and remembers well the early days of hip-hop radio, before consolidation, and commercialization set in. He currently lives in Oakland, California.

He's just a government do-gooder, first they come to help, they tell us why we need them and what they want to do "for us",  soon though they TELL you how to do it, followed by regualtions, fees, fines and processes to MAKE you do it and when its all said and done, you look at what has happened and see no one has really been helped much if at all, everything you had before doesn't work as well and it costs a lot more now. The beaurocrats are now in charge of implimenting this program and there's a new beaurocracy that sucks up a lot of money that we don't have. Next thing you'll know you have a new guy come and tell us we need more government to make this work, he'll tell us "here's what we will do for you".............  

By the way, to compare the US with Singapore and S. Korea is a little disingenuous and he knows it, someone should of called him on that one.

Seems like a noble cause until you see the hidden politics behind it: "Making government data accessible to mobile phone users could result in “more voices” and “better democracy,” he added.

So you mean more votes for the democratic party? Isn't that what this is really about? Progressive viewpoint under the guise of humanitarian projects?

Net Neutrality is about censorship. The current government would be very happy if opposing views were controlled or silenced.

Take a closer look and you see what the real goal of this is.

Karia, what 'hidden politics' are you referring to, exactly? the apps contest is about increasing broadband access for all Americans -- no partisan agenda there. it is true that Republicans have tended to oppose Net Neutrality -- even Tea Partiers who rely on an open Internet for their ideological campaigns -- but the concept is about democracy as an ideal, not the Democrats as a political party. NN is neutral as a concept--hence its name--so i have to wonder why you want to inject partisan politics into the issue.

 

I'd really like to see some sort of factual evidence supporting your claim that NN is about censorship. In actuality, NN supports the First Amendment. It's also a concept which precedes the Obama administration by at least four years.

 

If we're going to talk about suppression of opposing viewpoints, perhaps we should start with the Bush administration, who fired DoJ lawyers who opposed Gonzalez' and Dubya's ultra right-wing political ideology. Thusfar, Obama hasn't silenced Michelle Bachmann, though she is guilty of seditious, slanderous and factually-challenged claims about the POTUS. So, who is being silenced by NN?

 

And, don't the terms 'progressive' and 'humanitarian' go hand-in-hand? i've yet to hear of a regressive humanitarian platform. That seems like an oxymoron.

 

Also what opposing views are you talking about, anyway? Net Neutralitity is ideologically egalitarian, which is why both the Christian Coalition and the porn industry are both in favor of it.

 

The only opposing view i'm aware of is that of telecom companies and their lobbyists, who have a vested financial interest in killing NN. you wouldn't happen to be one of those, would you?