Mayor Jean Quan, East Bay officials push back against plans to eliminate redevelopment funds

Photo by Andrew Moberg

Standing in unison in the Uptown District, the epicenter of Oakland's most successful recent redevelopment, Bay Area leaders on Wednesday said they will continue to push back hard against Gov. Jerry Brown's proposal to cut redevelopment agencies. Brown is seeking to  close California's large budget gap.

Oakland Mayor Jean Quan; Council President Larry Reid; Union City Mayor Mark Green; Nora Davis, mayor of Emeryville; and other East Bay government officials said Brown's proposal is a short-sighted solution that if adopted would have long-term negative consequences.

Also on hand in the Uptown to voice their opposition to the Governor's proposal were members of regional business and construction trade councils, along with members of affordable housing organizations.

At the Henry J. Kaiser Memorial Park, across the street from the affordable family housing project Fox Courts, Quan and other leaders said redevelopment projects plays a critical role in the economic development of many California municipalities.

According to officials, redevelopment contributes more than $40 billion annually to California's economy and contributes an average of 304,000 full- and part-time private sector jobs in a typical year, including 170,600 construction jobs. Locally, if funds were cut, Oakland would lose $40 million in the first year and about $24 million per year thereafter.

"People underestimate the power of redevelopment developments," said Quan who proudly pointed to the area surrounding the park, including the Fox Theater and the Oakland School of the Arts.

"This is probably one of the biggest symbols of redevelopment under Mayor Jerry Brown," Quan said. "If you saw this, it looks nice enough now, but if you'd been here about 12 years ago you would of seen mostly deserted buildings, empty lots, (and) buildings that were badly damaged by the Loma Prieta earthquake and that were unusable."

Redevelopment, Quan said, successfully rebuilt the Fox Theater and turned the Uptown neighborhood into a vibrant community again.

"(Redevelopment) has totally revitalized this part of what we call Uptown, and it's made a huge difference," Quan said.

Green, who also is president of the Association of Bay Area Governments, said redevelopment dollars have also been vital in his hometown.

"Redevelopment isn't just for big cities like Oakland, or San Francisco, or San Jose," Green said. "Cities such as mine, Union City, are also a key player in the redevelopment agency area. We've had hundreds of homes built in Union City during the course of our redevelopment agency, affordable units next to BART. We've been assisting in removing blight in some of the oldest areas of the city. To say these things would have happened without redevelopment (money) in our case is absolutely crazy."

Speakers said the governor's proposal will devastate the state's construction industry, which has been hit hard by the Recession.

"Redevelopment projects generate a tremendous amount of employment, given the fact that they are extremely labor intensive and that they utilize the full range of crafts represented in the construction industry," said Andreas Cluver, secretary-treasurer of the Alameda County Building Trades Council. "And by eliminating those funds, many of those jobs that have been generated in construction will also be eliminated, putting the construction industry in even greater peril."

Officials said eliminating local redevelopment agencies also will cut deeply into affordable housing development.

"The vast majority of affordable housing we build in the state would not be possible without redevelopment," said Dan Sawislak, executive director of Resources for Community Development. His organization was the developer of the Fox Court. "If redevelopment goes away I think it's safe to say that you would slow the production of affordable housing in the state to a crawl, and that's just something we can't accept."

Quan said that while she believes there may not be enough state legislative votes to pass the governor's proposal, cities and California organizations are still working to find a compromise.

"We are still talking to the governor and trying to come up with an alternative that might give him what he needs without destroying redevelopment," Quan said.

A writer and photographer, Jennifer Inez Ward has been documenting Oakland neighborhoods for more than 10 years. A graduate of UC Berkeley’s Graduate School of Journalism, she focuses on the uniqueness and beauty of everyday life in a city that is too often overlooked for its treasures and pleasures. Throughout the years, Jennifer has had the honor of showcasing her work at a number of venues, including a permanent loan of images that are displayed on the front wall of Barnes and Nobel in Jack London Square. Jennifer is a featured artist documented in “Images of America: Black Artists in Oakland."

 

I would ask Jean what the heck she is thinking.   How can she be so worried about redevelopment funds when the money should be spent on public safety.  She should not be worried about redevelopment when people are being executed all over her town.  I think it is a great idea to do away with all of the redevelopment funds!

The Oakland agency is full of people pretending to know what they are doing but the reality is they are simply hacks. The public redevelopment money always ends up in the hands of corporations and the developers who lobby our greedy city employees. Also, the city has a way of snatching dollars from these restricted funds using central services overhead allocation journal entries, i.e. they make the redevelopment fund pay expenses that should be charged elsewhere. This money could be better spent on cops, outreach, fire etc.

Unfortunately, I don’t think Jerry’s threat was serious. He is just trying to use this as a bargaining chip for something else he wants. After all, when he was in Oakland, he loved redevelopment.

It definitely is the redistribution of wealth and it needs killing!

 

I think it's unfortunate that these redevelopment funds are being cut because it does seem like it is making some good. The key word being some.  The rush to redevelop these areas have left half finished projects all over downtown.  Some of these projects will need a little work and others will never be done because they are not self sustaining.  But what we really need to look at is where we can spend money to get the biggest return for our investment.  Oakland needs to be first of all safe and secure. No business or new home owner is going to choose to live in Oakland if the cost of doing business is too high.

 

Mayor Quan,

Who cares about the Fox Theater?!  If you want to increase property taxes in Oakland all you need do is 

1)Fix the School System - campaign promise

2)Make Oakland Safe - campaign promise

This will make property values increase and thus increase property taxes.  

Please consider Jerry Browns idea of scrapping redevelopment money and putting to better use by increasing funding of schools and cops.   No one gives a crap about the Fox Theater or other redevelopement projects.   

IF OAKLAND HAD GOOD SCHOOLS AND WAS SAFE DEVELOPERS WOULD BUILD WITHOUT REDEVELOPMENT DOLLARS....