North Oakland Charter School fights cell phone tower

North Oakland Community Charter School Children Play Near Proposed Cell Tower

North Oakland Community Charter School Children Play Near Proposed Cell Tower

A group of concerned parents at an Oakland elementary school are raising concerns about a possible decision to place nine Verizon cellular antennas across the street from the school and an adjacent park.

In a resolution passed last week, the Board of the North Oakland Community Charter School told the Oakland Planning Commission that it opposes an application by the owner of a nearby building, 1001 42nd Street, LLC, and Verizon Wireless to establish a new Mini-telecom facility within a few hundred feet from the 10-year old charter school.

 

The building is located in West Oakland, near the border with Emeryville. In addition to NOCCS, which has 150 students, the cellular towers would be located near single family homes and the Green City Lofts.


According to the NOCCS resolution, parents are primarily concerned with the potential health effects from the Electro Magnetic Frequency that cellular towers emit. Research on laboratory animals has demonstrated cellular degradation and reproductive problems with high frequency EMFs, such as with cellular towers.


The Federal Communications Commission has adopted safety standards for cellular towers. But because exposure is inversely proportional to distance from the towers, NOCCS parents are concerned that the close proximity to young children could put them at risk.


”We don’t want our children to be test cases,” said parent Julene Freitas.


In cases like this, municipalities have surprisingly little authority. The Telecommunications Act of 1996 prohibits municipalities from restricting cellular towers based on health concerns. With this case, the Oakland Planning Commission is being asked to approve the design and development details for a Major Conditional Use Permit.

 

As a result, school activists are asking the Oakland Planning Commission to direct Verizon Wireless to a more commercial area of Oakland, rather than so close to a residential neighborhood. Anticipating accusations of being NIMBYs (Not In My Back Yard), many parents say that while they use cell phones, they believe that Verizon could place towers in a business zone, rather than so close to their children’s school. Oakland's own Planning Code (Chapter 17.128 - Telecommunications Regulations) stipulates that preference for such antennas be in non-residential areas, rather than near homes, schools and parks. Therefore, NOCCS parents are asking the Commission to request an alternative site analysis.

Residents also question how necessary this tower is for the neighborhood’s cell phone usage. According to Ulla-Britt Jonsson of the city’s Commission, a Planner with the City of Oakland Planning and Zoning Division, the city does not have a map or even a list of cellular towers in the city.


NOCCS parents’ opposition to a cellular tower is not unique. School districts across the country, including the influential Los Angeles Unified School District, have restricted cellular towers on or near school property. However, in Europe, where EMF emission standards are much more stringent, the EU Parliament passed a resolution calling for more regulation of cellular towers based on health effects.


The Oakland Planning Commission is meeting Wednesday, February 17th at 6pm at Oakland City Hall, One Frank H. Ogawa Plaza, Hearing Room No. 1.

About Jen Schradie

Jen Schradier is a filmmaker, and a phd student at the berkeley center for new media, department of sociology, university of california, berkeley.among other things.
Cynthia Carpenter's picture

The Oakland General Plan is supposed to guide the Planning Commission in the transition of neighborhoods like ours (North Oakland).  There is no way that the zoning map shows a clear picture of what this corner of Oakland has become.  The idea that a mini-telecom facility is a neighborhood friendly business is just ridiculous.   The fact remains that it sits in what has become a mostly residential neighborhood with some small businesses. 

The Oakland Planning Commission should visit some of the neighborhoods to see what type of changes have occurred instead of depending on a carefully taken picture from the applicant and using outdated zoning maps to make their decisions.

 

jeremy watson's picture

I work in the mobile application company and I know that such company's decision is supported by the desire to earn much money. But I am also a father and I know that these cellular towers emit the Electro Magnetic Frequency and it can be harmful for people health. Personally I would never let to built such cellular towers near the school and I do not understand why our government does not take any prevention? This post is written before several months so I will definitely try to find more information about this event. I hope that everything now is solved and these children can feel safe now. Thanks a lot for the essential information and keep up publishing these informative articles in the future too. Respectfully, Jeremy Watson from mobile development

Paul Collins's picture

I don't blame these parents for voicing their concerns, because the fast is the these towers do put out radiation, and there is no long term evidence that proves these things are safe.

The same goes or Wifi in routers, there is no long term data, so why are we using them so widely?

We should not be using these thing "until" we know they are safe, and not otherwise. The problem is big telco businesses lobbying parliament with promises of big funding for suitable legislation, and I think that sucks!

Just my thoughts...

Paul Collins
Naturopath

Mark Waugh's picture

I think, antena should be moved away from the schoo because children are incoent and they are our future. So, we should take a care of our future.