North Oakland Community Charter School Children Play Near Proposed Cell Tower
A
group of concerned parents at an Oakland elementary school are raising
concerns about a possible decision to place nine Verizon cellular
antennas across the street from the school and an adjacent park.
In a resolution passed last week, the Board of the North Oakland Community Charter School told the Oakland Planning Commission that it opposes an application by the owner of a nearby building, 1001 42nd
Street, LLC, and Verizon Wireless to establish a new Mini-telecom
facility within a few hundred feet from the 10-year old charter school.
The building is located in West Oakland, near the border with Emeryville. In addition to NOCCS, which has 150 students, the cellular towers would be located near single family homes and the Green City Lofts.
According
to the NOCCS resolution, parents are primarily concerned with the
potential health effects from the Electro Magnetic Frequency that
cellular towers emit. Research on laboratory animals has demonstrated
cellular degradation and reproductive problems with high frequency
EMFs, such as with cellular towers.
The
Federal Communications Commission has adopted safety standards for
cellular towers. But because exposure is inversely proportional to
distance from the towers, NOCCS parents are concerned that the close
proximity to young children could put them at risk.
”We don’t want our children to be test cases,” said parent Julene Freitas.
In
cases like this, municipalities have surprisingly little authority. The
Telecommunications Act of 1996 prohibits municipalities from
restricting cellular towers based on health concerns. With this case,
the Oakland Planning Commission is being asked to approve the design
and development details for a Major Conditional Use Permit.
As
a result, school activists are asking the Oakland Planning Commission
to direct Verizon Wireless to a more commercial area of Oakland, rather
than so close to a residential neighborhood. Anticipating accusations
of being NIMBYs (Not In My Back Yard), many parents say that while they
use cell phones, they believe that Verizon could place towers in a
business zone, rather than so close to their children’s school.
Oakland's own Planning Code (Chapter 17.128 - Telecommunications
Regulations) stipulates that preference for such antennas be in
non-residential areas, rather than near homes, schools and parks.
Therefore, NOCCS parents are asking the Commission to request an
alternative site analysis.
Residents also question how necessary this tower is for the neighborhood’s cell phone usage. According to Ulla-Britt Jonsson of the city’s Commission, a Planner with the City of Oakland Planning and Zoning Division, the city does not have a map or even a list of cellular towers in the city.
NOCCS
parents’ opposition to a cellular tower is not unique. School districts
across the country, including the influential Los Angeles Unified
School District, have restricted cellular towers on or near school
property. However, in Europe, where EMF emission standards are much
more stringent, the EU Parliament passed a resolution calling for more regulation of cellular towers based on health effects.
The
Oakland Planning Commission is meeting Wednesday, February 17th at 6pm
at Oakland City Hall, One Frank H. Ogawa Plaza, Hearing Room No. 1.
The Oakland General Plan is supposed to guide the Planning Commission in the transition of neighborhoods like ours (North Oakland). There is no way that the zoning map shows a clear picture of what this corner of Oakland has become. The idea that a mini-telecom facility is a neighborhood friendly business is just ridiculous. The fact remains that it sits in what has become a mostly residential neighborhood with some small businesses.
The Oakland Planning Commission should visit some of the neighborhoods to see what type of changes have occurred instead of depending on a carefully taken picture from the applicant and using outdated zoning maps to make their decisions.
I work in the mobile application company and I know that such company's decision is supported by the desire to earn much money. But I am also a father and I know that these cellular towers emit the Electro Magnetic Frequency and it can be harmful for people health. Personally I would never let to built such cellular towers near the school and I do not understand why our government does not take any prevention? This post is written before several months so I will definitely try to find more information about this event. I hope that everything now is solved and these children can feel safe now. Thanks a lot for the essential information and keep up publishing these informative articles in the future too. Respectfully, Jeremy Watson from mobile development
I don't blame these parents for voicing their concerns, because the fast is the these towers do put out radiation, and there is no long term evidence that proves these things are safe.
The same goes or Wifi in routers, there is no long term data, so why are we using them so widely?
We should not be using these thing "until" we know they are safe, and not otherwise. The problem is big telco businesses lobbying parliament with promises of big funding for suitable legislation, and I think that sucks!
Just my thoughts...
Paul Collins
Naturopath
I think, antena should be moved away from the schoo because children are incoent and they are our future. So, we should take a care of our future.