Rep. Barbara Lee Holds Oakland Rally & Press Event to Urge End of the Occupation of Afghanistan
Barbara Lee Speaks Against War in Afghanistan at Press Event in Downtown Oakland
“The reality is we cannot afford, either in blood or treasure, an open-ended war. It is wrong,” Rep. Barbara Lee told a crowd of over 100 on a sunny Monday lunch hour in front of the Federal Building in downtown Oakland.
Rep. Lee held the combination press event and rally to address the war in Afghanistan and to gather support for H.R. 3699, legislation she introduced on October 1 that would prohibit funding for military escalation in Afghanistan. She called it a “clear and unequivocal message” against the on-going U.S. military involvement. H.R. 3699 currently has 23 co-sponsors, including several California representatives.
Rep. Lee was joined by Tom Hayden, former State Senator and long-time social justice and anti-war activist, Paul Cox, one of the founders of the Veterans Speaker Alliance, and actor Danny Glover.
Sharon Cornu, Executive Secretary-Treasurer of the Alameda Labor Council, introduced the speakers to a diverse gathering of about 100 people, including a large group of Code Pink activists who held signs saying “Barbara Lee still speaks for me” and “Grandmothers Against the War.”
“A year ago people voted for change, voted for a new moral authority,” Cornu said, expressing concern for a family member who is a long-time member of the armed services.
Rep. Lee took the stage to enthusiastic applause. Lee linked H.R. 3699 to her long history of being a vocal opponent of war. She was the sole dissenting member of Congress on the authorization of the use of military force after the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001. She voted no on what she called a “blank check” for open-ended military action.
Lee said that while 8 years ago she was a lone voice prior to the invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq, there are now many members of Congress and advisors who are saying no to escalation. But she added that what is needed is “street heat” all across the nation. “We have to make some noise in this country.”
But as President Obama weighs policy choices on Afghanistan, he is feeling pressure from different sides, Lee said. Top military commanders and advisors are asking for an increase in troop levels and funding. Some within the President’s own party agree, while others, including the Congressional Black Caucus and the Progressive Caucus, are pressuring Obama to re-think his entire Afghanistan policy.
In addition, the California Democratic Party passed a resolution last week calling for an end to the occupation of Afghanistan and an increase in humanitarian aid. The resolution supports “a timetable for withdrawal of our military personnel” and calls for “an end to the use of mercenary contractors as well as an end to air strikes that cause heavy civilian casualties.”
Meanwhile, Foreign Service officer and veteran Matthew Hoh resigned in protest and Obama’s own Ambassador to Kabul, Gen. Karl Eikenberry, is cautioning the President against scaling up U.S. military presence there.
Rep. Lee referred to a letter that she wrote in February with CA Representatives Maxine Waters and Lynne Woolsey—calling them the “sisters in the triad”--that spelled out what the costs were of continued U.S. presence in Afghanistan, both financial and in terms of national security. She also referred to a letter from the Congressional Black Caucus to President Obama last month calling for a comprehensive diplomatic plan and an exit strategy.
Lee said that “2009 is the deadliest year" of the war yet, for both U.S. and allied military forces and civilians in Afghanistan adding to the more than 900 U.S. soldiers, 600 Coalition soldiers, and 1000’s of Afghanistan civilians that have been killed.
“We know that there is no military solution in Afghanistan. We know that an open-ended presence is not in our national security and only fuels that insurgency. It is simply unacceptable to send more troops in harms way. It has been called the graveyard of empires, and for good reason.”
Lee thanked Obama for taking the time to think deeply about Afghanistan, saying “There is nothing wrong with dithering.” President Obama has recently been criticized for delaying his announcement of a revised Afghanistan strategy, charged with “dithering” by former VP Cheney.
But Lee also said that simply calling for a timetable for ending our military engagement with Afghanistan was not enough. She called for help to do away with the original 2001 resolution authorizing open-ended military action.
“We need to repeal this!"
Paul Cox, a veteran of the Vietnam War and a constituent of Lee’s who lives in Berkeley, spoke about the moral crisis of a nation that is cutting education budgets and social services, while “always having money for war.” He made several parallels to the situation in Vietnam 40 years ago, adding that the “war machine always requires ever more soldiers for the grinder.”
Taking his turn at the podium, Tom Hayden said that H.R. 3699, “does have teeth,” contrasting it with Massachusetts Rep. McGovern’s bill, which requires that the Pentagon deliver a plan for an exit strategy by the end of the year. In contrast, Lee’s bill cuts funding for sending more troops.
“The longer Obama ponders, the better chance we have” of ending the war. Hayden specifically called on Obama to reject the multi-trillion dollar Pentagon plan he called the “Doctrine of the Long War” which is a 50-year plan to engage in military action across an “arc of instability” throughout the Middle-East and parts of Africa and South and Central Asia. He said we are several years into that war and questioned the audacity of the authors of that plan that makes such critical decisions through a period that would span across 13 presidential administrations.
“What else costs a trillion dollars?” Hayden asked the crowd, which responded by yelling, “Health Care!” “That’s right,” he said, saying we cannot afford trillion dollar wars on top of health care and a new energy grid.
“Lee’s bill can define the progressive alternative to put pressure on a centrist president.”
Danny Glover emphasized the importance of putting the current war into context. Referring to the two previous speakers, Cox and Hayden, Glover said “they contextualize what the real issues are,” by pointing out the trajectory of the “historical resistance to the war machine.”
Glover pointed out that both he and Rep. Lee are “children of the civil rights movement” and invoked Martin Luther King, Jr. as someone who pointed out the connection between foreign wars and poverty at home.
Lee also invoked King's reference to war being the enemy of the poor. Calling her district (#9) the "most progressive, most diverse, most committed to dissent in the nation," Lee ended her speech by calling for action from her constituents and from people across the nation.
“We need to raise some noise!”
Obama is expected to announce his Afghanistan strategy in the next couple weeks.
More:
Read H.R. 3699 here.
See video clips of Barbara Lee speaking: 1, 2, 3


_0.jpg)
_1.jpg)
.jpg)
_0.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)

What bothers me more is that Barbara Lee, Maxine Water, Danny Glover and all these so called pacifist are always against the best interest of the United States of America. They have all professed a great admiration for Castro and Chavez (some pacifists) Any one that goes to Cuba as these people frequently go and come back saying that Cuba is a great society and the only problem is the ""blockade"" and the menace of invassion by the Marines should have either their head examine or their american citisenship.
"Always against the best interest of USA"? I find that quite hyperbolic. If one listens to the arguments they make against these wars and occupations you may find that they indeed have the best interests of the country at heart. Especially in the context of Babara Lee's history of fighting for a smart foreign policy and for her consistuents. I would ask you to consider whose interest we are talking about. Is it in the interest of the younger generation to die while occupying a foreign country? Is it in their interest to kill or see and do unconscionable things and thus be traumatized as many returning vets are? Is it in the interest of innocent civilians to die from bullets and bombs with our name-brand on it? Is it in the United States' economic interest to borrow money to continue military expansion? Is it in the interest of even U.S. national security, which is your presumed starting point? Many intelligence officers, veterans, and policy-makers in both political parties think it is in fact the opposite. Is it in our interest to fuel insurgency and radicals by occupying their land and killing their countrymen? Regarding your other point, I agree with you that Cuban leadership should be criticized and personally I am no fan of Castro. Yet despite that there are things worth learning from in Cuban society and humanitarian considerations when considering the issue of the blockade. However, even if they were completely wrong on that issue, even if they are holding bad company, it is completely separate from the issue of whether it is wise or foolish to continue pouring money and lives into open-ended military engagement in Iraq and Afghanistan. Furthermore, to suggest that someone should have their citizenship revoked because they hold a different of opinion about another culture or argue for the moral and economic failings of a foreign policy is reactionary to say the least.
Representative Barbara Lee is the most intelligent, logical political leader around today. She should be in the White House in order to get this nation back on track. The Bush Dynasty and the like, have plundered our country to the max, of which our children and grandchildren will be paying for their entire lives. The Middle East presents NO THREAT to us...they don't even have that type of technology, except outsiders who create "mini" attacks to incense Americans. We need to find jobs for OUR countrymen, REBUILD the mess we did to the Iraqui people (Schools, mosques, utilities, museums, etc.) and learn to be DIPLOMATIC, as Rep. Lee suggests. Bloodshed will only cause others to hate and distrust us more than they already do!
Representative Barbara Lee is the most intelligent, logical political leader around today. She should be in the White House in order to get this nation back on track. The Bush Dynasty and the like, have plundered our country to the max, of which our children and grandchildren will be paying for their entire lives. The Middle East presents NO THREAT to us...they don't even have that type of technology, except outsiders who create "mini" attacks to incense Americans. We need to find jobs for OUR countrymen, REBUILD the mess we did to the Iraqui people (Schools, mosques, utilities, museums, etc.) and learn to be DIPLOMATIC, as Rep. Lee suggests. Bloodshed will only cause others to hate and distrust us more than they already do!