BART police car, by Paul Sullivan, http://www.flickr.com/photos/pfsullivan_1056/4198357526/in/photostream/
Dear San Francisco,
I am one of your local physicians and have taken care of many different
kinds of people during the past nine years of my appointment as an
internist at UCSF, where I have worked at SF General Hospital as well as
at the VA and the UCSF campuses.
San Francisco is a surprisingly small
town, and when you spend enough time in the health care industry, you
come to recognize many of the city's residents. You hold their stories
and watch over them; in the hospital when they are ill and in the chance
occurrences of running into them on the streets, in the market or
painting the town red. It is an honor and great privilege to take care
of the people of this city that I love so dearly.
Last month, I learned that one of my former patients - Charles Hill - was
shot and killed by BART police. Per the police, he was armed with a
bottle and a knife and had menacing behavior. Per eye witnesses, he was
altered and appeared to be intoxicated, but did not represent a lethal
danger.
I remember Charles vividly, having taken care of him several
times in the revolving door, which is the health care system for the
people who do not fit neatly into society. Charles was a member of the
invisible class of people in SF - mentally ill, homeless and not reliably
connected to the help he needed. While I had seen him agitated before
and while I can't speak to all of his behavior, I never would have
described him as threatening in such a way as to warrant the use of
deadly force.
We often have to deal with agitated sometimes even violent
patients in the hospital. Through teamwork, tools and training, we have
not had to fatally wound our patients in order to subdue them. I
understand the police are there to protect us and react to the situation
around them, but I wonder why the officer who shot Charles did not aim
for the leg if he felt the need to use a gun, instead of his vital
organs. I wonder if he possessed other training methods to subdue an
agitated man with a knife or bottle.
I feel this situation quite deeply. It is hard to watch our civil
servants (police) brutally handle a person and their body when I spend
my time and energy as a civil servant (physician) honoring the dignity
of that person, regardless of their race or social class, their beliefs
or their affiliations. I know it is not my job - nor the police's
job - to mete out justice or judgment of a person's worthiness. It is
also hard because Charles has no voice, no one to speak for him now that
he is gone. It would be easy to let this slide and move on with our
busy lives, as we all struggle to make ends meet in this expensive city
during a recession. I believe this situation shows us how powerless we
all feel to some degree.
I feel outraged and am trying to find the best ways to express
it - through creative outpouring, through conversations. I would like to
lend my voice to the growing protest of the BART police's excessive use
of violent force and know that weekly protests are being organized on
Mondays until demands are met for BART to fully investigate the shooting
of Charles Hill, disarm its police force and train them properly, as
well as bringing the officer who shot him to justice.
The media is
portraying the annoyance of the protests to commuters more than the
unbelievable horror that an innocent man was shot dead by the force that
is meant to protect us. I don't want to upset commuters or be a
nuisance. I would like to be part of educating and not letting this slip
under the proverbial rug, in honor of Charles Hill and in order to help
prevent something like this from ever happening again.
I will be present at the peaceful demonstrations on Mondays in front of
the BART Civic Center station, not to prevent commuters from getting
home, but to educate a population that may need to pause and think about
the value a human life has and the kind of San Francisco we want to
live and work in.
Thank you for your time and thoughtful consideration.
Respectfully,
Rupa Marya, M.D.
Thank you for posting this.
Rupa makes several important points in this article. "Charles was a member of the invisible class of people in SF - mentally ill, homeless and not reliably connected to the help he needed." Not only are Bart police poorly trained, they also seem to be primarily protecting the interests of capital, not the safety of the passengers.
"The media is portraying the annoyance of the protests to commuters more than the unbelievable horror that an innocent man was shot dead by the force that is meant to protect us."
OpBart protests need to disrupt the commuters who depend on Bart because we all need to be aware of the issues with Bart as an organization. If we all show solidarity with Charles Hill, Oscar Grant, and other victims of Bart Police violence by stopping the normal flow of commuter traffic, then perhaps we can convince Bart that they need to change their policies.
Thank you, Oakland Local, for giving a voice to intelligent and informed people like Rupa Maya.
Thank you, we were thrilled to publish this piece.